@amber - This issue is the validity of the answer and its age - If the question older and is clean, and the answer is supported with hard facts then I don’t see any issue in accepting it. I don’t do it very often I think I’ve done it maybe twice this year, and its only after someone had posted something new to the question or answer so it came across my list.
***For the moderators the important issue is not the points it’s making sure the correct answer is the top most.***
There was a point when I arrived on the scene there was a bit of racing the clock for points which I thought was odd as there really nothing gained once you hit a certain level.
-
***The achievement is the quality of the answer what is offered for that persons benefit. Not sending them down a rabbit hole if misinformation.***
+
***The achievement is the quality of the answer what is offered for that persons benefit. Not sending them down a rabbit hole of misinformation.***
Chastising and/or embarrassing someone within the main site when you have a different option is not the way to deal with the matter. More so when other answers in the question or other questions for what ever reasons are biased as retribution because they are angry. Both actions show lack of professionalism.
A direct email to the person or post in Meta asking the why to that person would have been the correct way.
@amber - This issue is the validity of the answer and its age - If the question older and is clean, and the answer is supported with hard facts then I don’t see any issue in accepting it. I don’t do it very often I think I’ve done it maybe twice this year, and its only after someone had posted something new to the question or answer so it came across my list.
***For the moderators the important issue is not the points it’s making sure the correct answer is the top most.***
There was a point when I arrived on the scene there was a bit of racing the clock for points which I thought was odd as there really nothing gained once you hit a certain level.
-
The achievement is the quality of the answer what is offered for that persons benefit. Not sending them down a rabbit hole if misinformation.
+
***The achievement is the quality of the answer what is offered for that persons benefit. Not sending them down a rabbit hole if misinformation.***
Chastising and/or embarrassing someone within the main site when you have a different option is not the way to deal with the matter. More so when other answers in the question or other questions for what ever reasons are biased as retribution because they are angry. Both actions show lack of professionalism.
A direct email to the person or post in Meta asking the why to that person would have been the correct way.
@amber - This issue is the validity of the answer and its age - If the question older and is clean, and the answer is supported with hard facts then I don’t see any issue in accepting it. I don’t do it very often I think I’ve done it maybe twice this year, and its only after someone had posted something new to the question or answer so it came across my list.
-
For the moderators the important issue is not the points it’s making sure the correct answer is the top most.
+
***For the moderators the important issue is not the points it’s making sure the correct answer is the top most.***
There was a point when I arrived on the scene there was a bit of racing the clock for points which I thought was odd as there really nothing gained once you hit a certain level.
The achievement is the quality of the answer what is offered for that persons benefit. Not sending them down a rabbit hole if misinformation.
Chastising and/or embarrassing someone within the main site when you have a different option is not the way to deal with the matter. More so when other answers in the question or other questions for what ever reasons are biased as retribution because they are angry. Both actions show lack of professionalism.
A direct email to the person or post in Meta asking the why to that person would have been the correct way.
This issue is the validity of the answer and its age - If the question older and is clean, and the answer is supported with hard facts then I don’t see any issue in accepting it. I don’t do it very often I think I’ve done it maybe twice this year, and its only after someone had posted something new to the question or answer so it came across my list.
+
@amber - This issue is the validity of the answer and its age - If the question older and is clean, and the answer is supported with hard facts then I don’t see any issue in accepting it. I don’t do it very often I think I’ve done it maybe twice this year, and its only after someone had posted something new to the question or answer so it came across my list.
For the moderators the important issue is not the points it’s making sure the correct answer is the top most.
There was a point when I arrived on the scene there was a bit of racing the clock for points which I thought was odd as there really nothing gained once you hit a certain level.
The achievement is the quality of the answer what is offered for that persons benefit. Not sending them down a rabbit hole if misinformation.
Chastising and/or embarrassing someone within the main site when you have a different option is not the way to deal with the matter. More so when other answers in the question or other questions for what ever reasons are biased as retribution because they are angry. Both actions show lack of professionalism.
A direct email to the person or post in Meta asking the why to that person would have been the correct way.
This issue is the validity of the answer and its age - If the question older and is clean, and the answer is supported with hard facts then I don’t see any issue in accepting it. I don’t do it very often I think I’ve done it maybe twice this year, and its only after someone had posted something new to the question or answer so it came across my list.
For the moderators the important issue is not the points it’s making sure the correct answer is the top most.
There was a point when I arrived on the scene there was a bit of racing the clock for points which I thought was odd as there really nothing gained once you hit a certain level.
The achievement is the quality of the answer what is offered for that persons benefit. Not sending them down a rabbit hole if misinformation.
Chastising and/or embarrassing someone within the main site when you have a different option is not the way to deal with the matter. More so when other answers in the question or other questions for what ever reasons are biased as retribution because they are angry. Both actions show lack of professionalism.
A direct email to the person or post in Meta asking the why to that person would have been the correct way.
