I just noticed this, it was a while ago last time I saw a huge amount of moderation votes that have been made around the same time and a lot of them are in my opinion incorrect.
I ignore almost all votes about if an answer should be accepted, I don't feel like I know what helped the person writing the question and I don't want to vote against either, therefore I will just let them be.
But when there are a huge amount of votes for "Remove as spam/offensive" and almost all of them are fully possible and correct answers, some of them are even selected as the correct answer by the person asking the question while others have like 15+ upvotes.
I really have a hard time understanding why there are 4 votes out of 5 to remove answers that are selected as correct ones and I'm really curious if there is something I have totally missed in them.
I would really like to have your answers as to why you have chosen to vote to remove answers that are accepted or have 15+ votes.
I just noticed this, it was a while ago last time I saw a huge amount of moderation votes that have been made around the same time and a lot of them are in my opinion incorrect.
I ignore almost all votes about if an answer should be accepted, I don't feel like I know what helped the person writing the question and I don't want to vote against either, therefore I will just let them be.
But when there are a huge amount of votes for "Remove as spam/offensive" and almost all of them are fully possible and correct answers, some of them are even selected as the correct answer by the person asking the question while others have like 15+ upvotes.
I really have a hard time understanding why there are 4 votes out of 5 to remove answers that are selected as correct ones and I'm really curious if there is something I have totally missed in them.
I would really like to have your answers as to why you have chosen to vote to remove answers that are accepted or have 15+ votes.
@njaini [link|https://www.ifixit.com/User/3791676/Elvis+White|Elvis+White|new_window=true] @yvaneck @guardian10