Skip to main content
/

Site Navigation

Your Account

Choose Language

Discussion Topic

Looked at the Hazard Fraught iFixit clone toolkit - my thoughts

Receipt:

Anyway, I had to try and battle the Kia from he-double hockey sticks to try and get additional keys programmed after I had issues between 2 tools (one specialized, all system scanner. Even the locksmith struggled, so it's the ECU or wiring being squirrely, as I suspected), and HF was nearby. As I said when it came out in January, I'd see if I can find one. I found three and bought one.

Toolkit:

First, the most significant negative I have quickly found is that the "sorting tray" is a marketing embellishment. My issue is that it lacks any sorting mechanism (such as built-in ridges that act as a sorting tray) like the iFixit driver kit is known for. This line is borderline misleading at best unless you are sorting completely identical screws.

POTENTIALLY POSITIVE UPDATE: I checked to see if the tray issue I took issue with here is resolved. IT MAY HAVE BEEN :-). The site has since changed the language to "Magnetized case with built-in storage tray." That said, I'm leaving my comment about it alone until I can check a box in person (no, I'm not buying one to check marketing corrections).

The biggest thing I immediately noticed is the bit length is marginally shorter than the iFixit bits. I don't anticipate this will be an issue, as it passed a test I use when I have it handy (I use a Wii controller). Given it worked on a Wii controller, it's marginally shorter. I don't anticipate any issues with most devices but beware: Historically difficult devices like Playstation controllers, which even struggle with the iFixit kit, will almost certainly struggle with the HF kit. To be honest, I am posting this more as a caution to anyone considering this toolkit to consider the issue before purchasing it (or at least purchase standalone drivers at the same time).

There are a few other significant differences between the HF kit vs. the iFixit kit:

  • Same bit count, but some bits are missing
    • Notable examples
      • SIM eject
      • Y000
      • Y00
      • Hex 2.5
  • The bit extension is noticeably flimsier than the iFixit kit and uses magnets for the bit retention; that said, anyone who remembers the older Pro Techs will know this was a thing with older iFixit kits until it was revised. It "works" and helps bring the cost down in manufacturing at scale, but it means you need to watch your bits closely. It's okay, but don't expect it to be as good as the iFixit extension.
    • WHILE I AM CALLING THIS OUT, I'm not docking it, given the price of the HF toolkit. As mentioned above, the iFixit kit also used a magnet for a long time (original Pro Tech and early Gen2 Pro Tech revisions). It works, but it's nowhere near as good as the friction fit extension iFixit uses.
  • Subpar manufacturing tolerances cause the foam that holds the bits, extension, and handle to slip out of the case. This is not an issue with the iFixit product. The top case is pretty easy to align since it uses magnets, so this will largely help mitigate issues like bit loss.
    • While I'm going easy on the kit, I am a little concerned about this being a potential issue (more on this later in the "replacement part" notes). I had the same problem with two toolkits.
    • Potential fix: To mitigate this, the foam is glue-friendly, so you could put a drop of fabric glue on the corners in a nonvisible area. Super Glue or PVA glue is your best bet.
Block Image
Block Image
Block Image

Left (Flathead): HF

Right (P2): iFixit (Repair kit)

Block Image
Block Image
Block Image
Block Image
Block Image

Parts replaceability map

Block Image
Block Image

The magnet design is similar to an older Pro Tech revision; I can't place the year down, but it's not recent and is based on the older Pro Tech.

It's not a terrible toolkit, but the screwdriver case is flimsy, and the bits may not reach well in some cases. However, these issues are minor for the price, and the toolkit will likely hold up for a long time with hobbyist use.

My points of concern I made in January stand, especially after trying it: For professional use, skip this and get the iFixit kit; the extra money is worth it.

Overall thoughts:

To recap, here's where I stand on each documented issue:

  • "Sorting tray" marketing is borderline misleading. This kit DOES NOT have an integrated sorting tray; this was a cut and paste. Either add it or remove this, HF. This isn't shocking, but you can do better than borderline lying on the box and in your marketing.
    • Next time I go to HF, I'll check a box or two and make sure, but this may be fixed.
  • The marketing: This is a hobbyist-grade product sold as a "professional" product; they do this a lot, so I'm not surprised (and to be honest, their primary audience is someone doing a big job like an engine swap/rebuild and needs semi-disposable tools as a major DIY job they aren't going to use regularly). I'd still much rather see them improve the quality and get it to a near professional quality product; otherwise, make two: A hobbyist grade kit and a professional grade one for a few bucks more. That said, the lack of individually available parts would still put me off because professional products have spare parts available.
    • This disagreement is further reinforced by some quality compromises, such as the bit extension being "good enough" and using magnets instead of a friction design and the poor foam fitting tolerances in the screwdriver case seen on two copies.
    • I am docking points here. This CAN be better, but I'm also not being too harsh due to the price of the set. This is a far cry better than what we had for cheap toolkits when I was younger (Radio Shack was still somewhat relevant, Limewire and Bearshare ruled the file-sharing world, Pirate Bay replaced Limewire, and SOPA was a thing).
      I also have some minor issues with the driver color similarities on the bottom end. It's only a few shades away from the iFixit product. This is mostly superficial, given you're not going to mistake the two.

As a professional kit? No. The lack of spare parts, quality shortcuts, and cautionary issues make it a hobby product; the lack of replacement parts sealed this issue for me. On the other hand, given its completeness, I think it's a valid choice for an excellent first toolkit or something to have around for hobby use (think for repairs like drones and small household electronics). Professional use? iFixit. HF? Hobbyist.

It's also a solid choice for uses like a vocational school, mainly because it doesn't include a knife (for years, many of them came with it). We all know how sensitive schools are to any remote threat and how willing they are to throw the hammer at you for an honest mistake and beat you over the head.

The box:

Block Image
Block Image
Block Image
Block Image
Block Image
Block Image

The box is cheaply printed cardboard. The tab is plastic (it's the type where recycling viability is questionable) (1). Outside of the tab, the box is otherwise easily recycled, given its blandness. It is probably easier to recycle than the iFixit box (the iFixit box has two parts, and one has plastic over the print for a gloss effect). This COULD cause issues in recycling in comparison (if you actively recycle). The only thing needed when "recycling" is to take the plastic tab out beforehand, but this is also true for the iFixit box, which also uses a resin code last I checked (Resin code 4), which is notorious for not being recycled. Given there's no resin code on the HF tab, I can only assume it's resin codes 3-7 (all of these are known to be questionable if they are processed for recycling).

Reply to discussion Subscribe to discussion

Is this a worthwhile discussion?

Score 5
3 Comments

@amber definitely something interesting as a budget toolkit.

by

@nick While I tend to be quite biased towards iFixit tools, any tool that gets the job done is perfectly acceptable.

by

@amber That's why I mentioned it. It's similar enough and good enough quality I like it as a budget starter toolkit, but I mentioned the few noteworthy flaws so you know what you're getting as well.

Maybe I'm being a bit cautious about it for professional use, but it's a first generation toolkit as far as I can tell and their first try. If they can fix those little issues and make parts available, that will go a long way. It just seems like a less then ideal kit lacking spare part availability.

by

Add a comment

2 Replies

Most Helpful Answer
Block Image
Block Image

Since I managed to break the HF reverse tweezers (and the iFixit ones a little bit ago, I just haven't done a warranty claim on the iFixit ones yet), I tested to see if we can buy the tips from a place like iFixit and swap them out on the cheap (providing you're throwing it in a order due to shipping). These CAN BE repaired with the iFixit tips if you want a cheap fix :-). The "warranty" isn't worth my time on a $35 toolkit so even if this voids it so be it.

Not sure of the warranty implications of doing this on a $3 set of tips and how much it matters (/s). If you're that particular, just buy the actual tweezers and then throw these away I guess.

Was this reply helpful?

Score 2
Add a comment

https://www.harborfreight.com/electronic...

If anyone wants to buy this kit here’s the link. I’d really recommend buying in the store due to the fact HF charges shipping though, and it may add a good amount of money to the purchase price in some cases. It may not be complete for ALL situations but it’s plenty for 90% of hobbyist work.

Was this reply helpful?

Score 0
Add a comment

Join the discussion

Nick will be eternally grateful.